RELINFRA - Fundamental Analysis: Financial Health & Valuation
Back to ListFundamental Rating: 2.9
| Stock Code | RELINFRA | Market Cap | 2,756 Cr. | Current Price | 67.4 ₹ | High / Low | 425 ₹ |
| Book Value | 595 ₹ | Dividend Yield | 0.00 % | ROCE | -1.41 % | ROE | -8.12 % |
| Face Value | 10.0 ₹ | DMA 50 | 95.9 ₹ | DMA 200 | 179 ₹ | Chg in FII Hold | -0.19 % |
| Chg in DII Hold | 0.18 % | PAT Qtr | -166 Cr. | PAT Prev Qtr | -152 Cr. | RSI | 34.1 |
| MACD | -4.76 | Volume | 4,44,666 | Avg Vol 1Wk | 4,44,666 | Low price | 64.2 ₹ |
| High price | 425 ₹ | Debt to equity | 0.03 | 52w Index | 0.89 % | Qtr Profit Var | -75.2 % |
| EPS | -10.0 ₹ | Industry PE | 32.1 |
📊 Financial Overview: Reliance Infrastructure (RELINFRA) shows weak fundamentals. Quarterly PAT declined further to -₹166 Cr. from -₹152 Cr., reflecting continued losses. ROE at -8.12% and ROCE at -1.41% highlight poor efficiency and negative returns. Debt-to-equity ratio of 0.03 indicates low leverage, but this is due to weak operations rather than strong cash flows. EPS of -₹10.0 reflects ongoing losses, while book value of ₹595 suggests the stock trades far below intrinsic worth, but profitability concerns overshadow this.
💰 Valuation Indicators: The stock currently has no meaningful P/E due to negative earnings. P/B ratio of ~0.11 (₹67.4 / ₹595) indicates deep undervaluation, but this is driven by weak fundamentals. PEG ratio is```html
Fundamental Rating: 2.8
📊 Financial Overview: Reliance Infrastructure (RELINFRA) shows weak fundamentals. Quarterly PAT declined further from -₹152 Cr. to -₹166 Cr., reflecting continued losses. ROE at -8.12% and ROCE at -1.41% highlight poor efficiency and negative returns. Debt-to-equity ratio of 0.03 indicates low leverage, but this is overshadowed by negative earnings. EPS of -₹10.0 reflects ongoing losses, while cash flows remain under strain.
💰 Valuation Indicators: The stock currently has no meaningful P/E ratio due to negative earnings. P/B ratio of ~0.11 (₹67.4 / ₹595) suggests deep undervaluation relative to book value, but this is driven by weak profitability. PEG ratio is unavailable, highlighting valuation distortion. Intrinsic value appears significantly lower than book value, leaving high uncertainty for investors.
🏢 Business Model & Competitive Advantage: RELINFRA operates in infrastructure, power, and engineering projects. Its competitive advantage lies in legacy projects and government contracts. However, sustained losses, weak return metrics, and declining investor confidence undermine overall health.
📈 Entry Zone & Holding Guidance: Considering weak fundamentals, an attractive entry zone lies only for speculative investors around ₹60–₹65 (near recent lows). Long-term holding is risky unless profitability improves significantly. Current price levels are not favorable for fresh entry for conservative investors.
Positive
- 🌟 Large asset base with book value of ₹595 per share
- 💡 Government-backed infrastructure projects
- 🛡️ Very low [debt-to-equity](ca://s?q=Debt_to_equity_ratio_explained) ratio of 0.03
Limitation
- ⚠️ Negative [ROE](ca://s?q=Explain_ROE) (-8.12%) and [ROCE](ca://s?q=Explain_ROCE) (-1.41%)
- 📉 Continuous quarterly losses
- 🔎 No valid [P/E ratio](ca://s?q=Explain_P/E_ratio) due to negative earnings
- 📊 EPS of -10.0 reflects poor profitability
Company Negative News
- 📉 Decline in FII holdings (-0.19%)
- ⚠️ Profit contraction continues with -75.2% variation
Company Positive News
- 📈 Increase in DII holdings (+0.18%) shows limited domestic support
- 💡 Large book value provides theoretical asset backing
Industry
🏗️ The infrastructure and power industry trades at an average P/E of 32.1. RELINFRA’s lack of profitability makes comparison difficult. Industry growth is supported by government spending, but RELINFRA’s weak fundamentals limit its ability to capitalize on opportunities.
Conclusion
✅ Reliance Infrastructure offers asset backing and government-linked projects but suffers from weak returns, continuous losses, and poor efficiency. Entry around ₹60–₹65 is speculative and suitable only for high-risk investors. Long-term holding is not advisable unless profitability and earnings stability improve significantly.
Would you like me to extend this with a peer comparison or a infrastructure sector outlook to deepen the perspective?