ASTRAZEN - Fundamental Analysis
Last Updated Time : 02 Aug 25, 12:58 am
Back to Fundamental ListFundamental Rating: 3.9
Here’s a detailed breakdown of ASTRAZEN’s fundamentals, valuation, and long-term potential 💡📈
🧾 Core Financials Review
Profit Growth
Quarterly PAT surged from ₹54.7 Cr. to ₹62.3 Cr., marking a solid 57.7% quarterly variation—a strong earnings momentum.
EPS of ₹46.3 reflects decent earnings strength for its price band.
Return Metrics
ROCE: 33.4% and ROE: 23.6% — well above average, signaling efficient capital deployment.
Debt to Equity: Just 0.05, confirming a low-risk capital structure.
Liquidity & Leverage
Minimal debt combined with rising profits suggests reliable internal cash generation, though cash flow data isn't directly provided.
📊 Valuation Indicators
Metric Value Meaning
P/E Ratio 127 Extremely high vs. industry PE of 32; indicates overvaluation
P/B Ratio ~28.89 Strong premium; not favorable for value investors
PEG Ratio 2.94 Highly stretched valuation vs. growth
Dividend Yield 0.36% Low; not attractive for income investors
Intrinsic Value Estimated < ₹7,000 Premium valuation outweighs intrinsic fundamentals
🔍 Overall, the stock trades at a significant premium—likely driven by brand strength or sector confidence.
🧬 Business Model & Competitive Moat
Operates in healthcare/pharmaceuticals—a resilient, evergreen sector.
Strong IP and product pipeline advantages, plus deep institutional recognition.
Likely benefits from global affiliations and R&D investments, enhancing defensibility.
🔁 Technical Analysis & Entry Zone
DMA 50: ₹8,995 vs. Current Price ₹8,894 — price hovering near short-term average.
DMA 200: ₹8,043 — technically bullish over medium term.
RSI at 44.9 indicates neutral zone—neither oversold nor overbought.
MACD negative and volume trending below average, hinting at short-term weakness.
🎯 Entry Zone Suggestion
Consider accumulation below ₹8,300, preferably closer to ₹7,500–₹7,800 if correction occurs.
📅 Long-Term Holding Outlook
Solid returns, negligible debt, and pharma sector tailwinds support a buy-on-dips strategy.
⚠️ Valuation is a concern—may result in muted short-term returns.
✅ Long-term hold (>5 years) is viable if accumulated at lower levels.
Would you like a peer comparison with other pharma stocks like Dr. Reddy’s or Cipla? I can whip that up too 📌
Edit in a page
Back to Fundamental List